Early Access • Building 2026

You can't scale a vibe.Codify it.

Turn brand identity into governance-grade artifacts. Measure behavioral alignment. Govern decisions at scale.

Why values fail to govern decisions

Values become slogans, slogans become vibes, vibes become nothing.

Without codification, brand principles can't survive the pressure of quarterly targets, urgent customer requests, or cross-functional disagreement. The problem isn't intention—it's that stated values and operational reality drift apart, and most organizations can't measure the gap, much less govern it.

Four-layer behavioral intelligence platform

Each layer builds on the previous one to create a closed-loop system for brand governance—from defining identity to measuring alignment to governing decisions to fixing structural misalignment.

Discovery

Extract and codify brand identity through evidence-based inquiry. Turn intuition into governance-grade tenets with explicit tradeoffs, exclusions, and observable behaviors.

Archetype + Codified Tenets

Telemetry

Measure behavioral alignment through revealed preference. Game-theoretic scenarios show where stated values meet operational reality. Establishes behavioral baseline.

Alignment Scores + Friction Maps

Parallax

Govern ongoing decisions through multi-perspective classification. Distinguish variance from exception from violation. Track exception genealogy and codify justified exceptions into doctrine.

Decision Classifications + Doctrine

Intervention

Translate behavioral patterns into structural recommendations. When violations cluster, recommend interventions: role redesign, process restructure, incentive realignment.

Structural Interventions

Evidence-based extraction through adaptive inquiry

Every tenet is anchored in evidence. Every field requires quotes. Every claim is confidence-scored. The process extracts what you already know and validates it survives interrogation.

Phase One

Context Capture

Four questions establish the strategic landscape: industry positioning, competitive dynamics, customer pain points, and differentiation. This anchors everything in operational reality.

Industry context + strategic positioning
Phase Two

Seed Questions

6-7 visceral questions extract emotional anchors: pride moments, anger triggers, explicit exclusions, soul-selling boundaries. These reveal principles under pressure.

Evidence anchors with confidence scores
Phase Three

Hypothesis Generation

AI synthesizes brand archetype and customer psychotype from conversation patterns. Every hypothesis is confidence-scored based on evidence quality.

Brand archetype + customer model
Phase Four

Dynamic Interview

Adaptive questioning resolves contradictions, strengthens weak tenets, and extracts missing evidence. Questions adapt based on uncertainty. Maximum 12 questions.

Ranked evidence pack (top 16 anchors)
Phase Five

Tenet Synthesis

Generate tenets with explicit rule, tradeoff, exclusion, and observable behaviors. Every field must map to evidence anchors. No claims without quotes.

Governance-grade tenets (scored 0-5)
Phase Six

Quality Validation

Bridge Integrity Score measures whether the tenet connects brand identity, customer needs, and market reality. Only 4-5 rated tenets lock.

Immutable governance baseline

What makes a tenet governance-grade

We measure tenet quality through Bridge Integrity Scores and evidence anchoring. Every word must be defensible.

📊

Bridge Integrity Score

Measures how well a tenet connects brand identity, customer needs, and market reality. Scale: 0 (disconnected) to 5 (perfect bridge). Only tenets scoring 4 or 5 are lockable.

Lockable threshold: 4+ • Tenets below 4 trigger additional questions
🔗

Evidence Anchoring

Every tenet field must map to direct quotes from your answers. Approximately 12 anchors are extracted per answer, ranked by confidence × recency. The top 16 form the evidence pack.

"We never discount"
"We lost the Acme deal because we wouldn't budge on price. That hurt, but that's who we are. The moment we start negotiating, we're just another vendor."
Confidence: 92%Tag: TradeoffSource: Q6

Behavioral truth without surveillance

Telemetry measures whether you actually behave according to stated values—without monitoring work, reading email, or surveilling employees.

Methodology

Revealed Preference

Game-theoretic scenarios force value trade-offs. No "right" answers—only revealed patterns. Compare behavioral archetype to Discovery baseline.

Privacy Architecture

Anonymous IDs

Responses use participant_anonymous_id, not employee IDs. Team aggregates require minimum 5 people. Access logging for compliance.

Output

Alignment Scores

Individual behavioral archetype + alignment score (0-100%). Team friction maps show where stated and lived values diverge.

Building 2026

Quarterly Baseline

Re-assess every quarter. Track alignment trends over time. Identify where tenets break down in practice. Feed into Parallax.

Four layers working in concert

From defining who you are to measuring behavioral alignment to governing decisions at scale.

Discovery

● Live
Extract and codify brand identity through evidence-based inquiry. Turn intuition into governance-grade tenets with explicit tradeoffs, exclusions, and observable behaviors.
Output
Archetype + Codified Tenets + Evidence Pack + Bridge Integrity Scores

Telemetry

Building 2026
Measure behavioral alignment through revealed preference. Game-theoretic scenarios show where stated values meet operational reality. Privacy-preserving architecture.
Output
Alignment Scores + Friction Maps + Cross-Functional Divergence + Behavioral Baseline

Parallax

Building 2026
Govern ongoing decisions through multi-perspective classification. Distinguish variance from exception from violation. Track exception genealogy. Codify exceptions into doctrine.
Output
Decision Classifications + Doctrine Updates + Exception Genealogy + Governance Audit Trail

Intervention

Future
Translate behavioral patterns into structural recommendations. When violations cluster, recommend interventions: role redesign, process restructure, incentive realignment.
Output
Structural Interventions + Root Cause Analysis + Effectiveness Tracking

Continuous integration for culture

Discovery establishes immutable source truth. The operational loop continuously measures, classifies, intervenes, and remeasures—CI/CD for organizational behavior.

Discovery codifies tenets (immutable source). Tenets flow to Telemetry(measures behavior) and Parallax (governance rules). Telemetry scores feed Parallax for classification. Violations trigger Intervention (structural fixes). Fixes loop back to Telemetry for remeasurement.

Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment

Deploy fix → Remeasure behavior → Reclassify decisions → Detect new violations → Deploy new fix. The operational loop (Telemetry ↔ Parallax ↔ Intervention) runs continuously while Discovery tenets remain locked.

Codify what you already know.

Leave with locked Tenets your team can reference—without debating what "the brand" means every time a decision matters.